Thursday, June 4, 2015

The Internet's Insatiable Interest in Freshman Beanie Caps

In the last couple of days, I've been thinking a lot about why my article about Concordia College's freshman beanie caps has received more than a quarter of a million page views during the past six years.

During the past week (May  27 - June 4) my blog has received 1,144 page views, of which 475 (42%) were on my beanie article.

Did some computer programmer create an application with an endless loop that visits that webpage almost a hundred times a day?

Is my article being used, without my knowledge, as part of some international spam operation?

One simple possibility is that a surprisingly enormous number of people search the Internet for articles about freshman beanie caps. I did a Google search for "freshman beanie caps", and I found that my article was listed as #30. In other words, there are 29 webpages about freshman beanie caps that get even more page views than my article gets.

Perhaps collecting vintage beanie caps is a big business.

---------

UPDATE (July 19): My brother Peter is a computer expert, and he suggested that the beanie article gets a lot of page views because it includes a photograph of black-and-white saddle shoes. Very few people care about beanie caps, but lots of women still search the Internet for information about saddle shoes. I think Peter's suggestion is the explanation.

--------

During that same week, my blog received page views from the following countries:

USA = 327

France = 136

Germany = 108

Belgium = 98

United Kingdom = 52

Russia = 33

Czech Republic = 15

Australia = 9

Greece = 9

Thailand = 9

Since those numbers add up to 787, there must have been a lot of countries, with numbers less than 9, that Blogger did not list in order for the grand total to be 1,144. (Or else Blogger cannot identify the country of origin for many page views.)

Blogger does not tell me which particular countries accounted for the page views specifically on my beanie article.

---------

My articles that received the most page views in the last week:

Concordia College Freshman Beanie Caps = 475

Campus Buildings That Are Gone = 84

The Trampoline in St John's Basement = 43

Reinhold Marxhausen's Sound-Making Sculptures = 28

The Meaning of the Movie "Footloose" = 19

Pledging Allegiance to the Christian Flag = 15

The Meaning of the Movie "Doubt" = 11

----------

My two articles explaining movies have received a lot of total page views:

The Meaning of the Movie "Doubt" = 1,268  total page views

The Meaning of the Movie "Footloose" = 1,027 total page views

---------

I have another blog devoted entirely to the movie Dirty Dancing. The last time I posted an article on that blog was in January 2009. During the past month, that blog averaged about 56 page views a day.

In its entire existence, that blog has received 63,884 page views.

The blog's most viewed article, Robbie Gould's Philosophy, has received 11,640 page views.

Monday, June 1, 2015

My Blog's Most-Read Articles

Even though I've neglected this blog for two years, it still gets a lot of page views.

* May 24 = 178 page views

* May 25 = 254 page views

* May 26 = 215 page views

* May 27 = 213 page views

* May 28 = 162 page views

* May 29 = 98 page views

* May 30 = 177 page views

* June 1 (at 6:30 p.m.) = 241 page views

The main reason I still get so many page views is an article I wrote about freshman beanie caps in May 2009. That article currently averages almost a hundred page views a day -- and has accumulated more than a quarter-million page views in the past six years!

If this is some kind of nefarious manipulation of the Internet, I cannot imagine its purpose.

Blogger provides me statistics on page views. Below is a list of my webpages that have been visited most often. In a few of the cases, Blogger provided the number of views I got in the last week -- from May 25 through June 1, 2015.

Concordia College Freshman Beanie Caps = 259,970 page views
 613 page views in the last week.  
Reinhold Marxhausen's Sound-Making Sculptures = 4,717 page views
22 page views in the last week.
Campus Buildings That Are Gone = 4,348 page views
113 page views in the last week.
The Trampoline in St. John's Basement = 4,182 page views
58 page views in the last week.
The Gospel According to Peanuts - 3 = 1,925 page views

The Students of St John School, 1952-53 = 1,532 page views

Pledging Allegiance to the Christian Flag = 1,358 page views
16 page views in the last week.
Bohemians = 1,272 page views
7 page views in the last week.
The Meaning of the Movie "Doubt" = 1,262 page views
11 page views in the last week.
Someone has left this comment:  
No one has commented on this yet? I think this is a great, well-thought out, well explained commentary. Great job.
Moving from the Old Library to the New Library = 1,169 page views

The Meaning of the Movie "Footloose" = 1,010 page views
15 page views in the last week. 
Someone has left this comment:  
This is the most insightful and thorough analysis of this movie I have ever encountered. Thank you for taking the time to create this.
Mike Sylwester's Last Will and Testament = 895 page views

Audio-Visual Equipment = 676 page views

The Settlement of German Lutherans in Seward County = 599 page views

Mark Lemke, RIP = 430 page views

The Weller Family's Move from Indiana to Nebraska = 422 page views

St John Hi Lights, May 1968 -- Part 2 = 397 page views

James Blomenberg, RIP = 387 page views

Deep Reasons for St John's Enrollment Collapse = 282 page views

Memories of Kathy Lange Brakke = 270 page views

Exercising to the song "Chicken Fat"

Recently our television was on in another room, and I was suprised to hear a few seconds of the song Chicken Fat. (Since then, I've read that the Apple computer company included the sound bite in a television advertisement, but I never have seen the advertisement.)  



Here is another video, featuring pretty, exercise-astute cheerleaders. 




As I remember, Mr. Peter made our fifth-grade class do this exercise routine on the school's basketball court a few times every week. We could not do it every day, because it made our muscles so sore. 


We were told that President Kennedy encouraged all elementary schools to institute this exercise routine, because American kids were too flabby. President Kennedy valued vigour in children.




The routine is longer -- almost seven minutes -- than I remembered it.


Now I recognize the unforgettable voice as belonging to Robert Preston, famous for playing the role of The Music Man


While browsing through Google for information about Chicken Fat, I came across an amusing blog written by "Retro Mimi", who diets using Weight Watchers recipes from the 1970s. She writes about herself:

I am a Pittsburgh girl with a passionate love for potatoes and carbs and butter. 
For some reason, I recreate long-forgotten Weight Watchers recipes from the 1970's in my own kitchen. Sometimes they are surprisingly tasty. Most of the time they are dreadful. Often my house smells like boiled celery. I get way too excited about buying vintage Pyrex and unmolding gelatine. 

I am a Weight Watchers lifetime member. I am the daughter of a Weight Watchers lifetime member. I am obsessed with all things Weight Watcher.
I am taking over the culinary world... one envelope of Knox Gelatin at a time. 
It all started with one cookbook... Once upon a time, a friend gave me a copy of the "1972 Weight Watchers Revised Program Cookbook" (WWRPC). Coincidentally, 1972 was also the year my mom joined WW and lost a great deal of weight after I was born. I became fascinated by this book, and I started wondering what it would be like to follow the same plan that Jean Nidetch and my mom followed almost 40 years ago. The rest is history. 
Anyway, Retro Mini wrote this article about the exercise song Chicken Fat.  
If you are like me and grew up in the 60's or 70's, you were probably tortured by this song at some point in your life.
Sung by Robert Preston (The Music Man), and sent to every school in the U.S. as part of a Youth Fitness Program in the 60's, it is guaranteed to get you moving.
Plus---once you hear it, you will NEVER GET IT OUT OF YOUR HEAD.
We had a copy of this record at our house, and I still remember doing the "Chicken Fat" workout with my mom and grandmother on a regular basis. We had such a great time yelling, "Give that chicken fat back to the chicken and don't be chicken again!"
I have posted the entire "Chicken Fat" song for your retro fitness enjoyment. Now get up, get moving and flap those wings!   
Am I the only weirdo that remembers this?
A lot of people commented on Retro Mimi's Chicken Fat article, and I followed links to another blog article written by someone named Noreen Braman.  
The President Kennedy and Chicken Fat Song Connection
Anyone who was in school during the 60s remembers the President's Physical Fitness program, instituted by President Kennedy, and the tests you took to prove how American Strong you were. For me, it was the chin up that was my demise, my flabby arms unable to lift me up more than once, and I am not even sure I did it once.
The program had a television commercial that I have been desperately searching for. It featured a depiction of a human as a head on a TV screen that barked orders to a robot. Where it should be taken, etc. At one point, the robot just wanders off, leaving the TV head person to just keep shouting at the robot whose name I seem to remember was "Z-12." The moral of the story? Use your body, or someday you won't have one anymore. It was an idea that resurfaces in the the Pixar animated film, "Wall E" where bloated, obese humans have every need met by robots and machinery. Cautionary tales meant to inspire us to take care of our bodies and the planet.
I remembered the President's Physical Fitness challenge with a wistful nostalgia, a noble idea that never quite got me to improve my chin-up performance, but did serve as a source of reward for those more athletically inclined, including my own children when they were in grammar school. What I never remembered, until now, was that this program also came with an evil, menacing, demeaning piece of music that has been recently resurrected by a commercial for Apple. 
It appears that the "Chicken Fat" song, which became the soundtrack of my adolescent nightmares, was actually titled "The Youth Fitness Song" and it was commissioned by the President's Council on Physical Fitness. Written by Meredith Wilson ("The Music Man") and recorded by "Music Man" star, Robert Preston. My brain, which has been screaming since I first heard this song playing in the commercial, is now on full about-to-meltdown red alert. Say it isn't so!
Oh yes, we've got trouble, right here in EVERY CITY IN AMERICA. Sure, Apple shortens the torture, it almost sounds catchy. But listen to it, preserved for posterity on the JFK Library website. 
And if you want to sing along, here, via Lyrics Playground, are the words. Every torturous verse. 

Former St John student writing novel about Seward

Below is an e-mail and attached photograph that I have received:

------------------


Hello There,

I  accidentally came upon your Blog about Seward Nebraska. It was along time ago and we were there for a short time as the Atlas F Missiles were being built in the state. We stayed in a motel for what seemed like forever until housing could be located. We found our way to a house that had been moved on to the land at 1542 N Columbia.

In 2011, I was in Omaha to run the half marathon and took a drive over to Seward and was immediately brought back to that time in 1962-63 when we lived in Seward and I attended Saint John's school. 

2011 had been a difficult year as I had just lost my job during the financial crises of the time. I was lost and quite sure that my world was coming to an end. So much so that although we had paid the entrance fee and had our reservations before I discovered that my company was closing my office down, I was not able to train. So depressed that I could not lace up my shoes to train. I preferred sitting, staring at the wall to running along the coast of California. I ended up walking half of the 13 miles in Omaha.

As I returned to Seward and recalled the fun my brother and had living there, my mind was suddenly alive with thoughts. I think my husband was convinced that I was going nuts. I began telling him stories about our time there. We had went from a urban location to what at that time was the middle of a corn field. Our mother hated it, but my brother and I thought it was heaven on earth as we were free to explore our surroundings.

Seeing Seward again inspired me to return to school to study creative writing which I did and now and for the past three years have been writing a fictional novel based on our time in Seward. Please note "fictional." My life did not end, it has thrived and the loss of my job turned out to be a blessing.

I have since been back to Seward in June of 2014 with one of our daughters and stayed at the Liberty House, attended one of the concerts in the Clam and walked the trails that were once train tracks behind our house. This was when we were finally able to figure out which house was the one that we had lived in and the owners were kind enough to allow me a peek inside. I returned again in October of 2015 to meet Ted Koosler at Chapters books and walk the neighborhoods.

Seward is such a wonderful place to raise a family. I am jealous of those who are able to spend a life time there. I will attach a photo of me bundled up in front of our house. It is very poor quality but it is what I have.

Thanks for the blog and what you do for the community, 

Patricia [née Riney] Tennesen



[Mike writing now]

Thanks for your interesting letter about your unusual relationship to Seward.

Your letter reminded me of a strange memory of my own about missiles in Seward. I was a boy -- this might have been in about 1962 - 1963 -- watching a basketball game with some of my friends in the campus's basketball court. A couple of young men (maybe in their twenties) came in and sat in the bleachers near where I was sitting. 

We struck up a conversation, and they told me that they were driving a truck that was transporting a missile (or some missiles) to Alaska. They decided to take a break from their drive, and so they stopped in Seward, heard about the basketball game, and decided to stop by and watch.

My friends and I did not believe this strange story, but the young men insisted casually that it all was the truth. 

"Why would we lie about it?" they asked. 

"Aren't you supposed to keep that kind of thing top-secret?" we asked. 

"Who are you going to tell?" they asked back.

I remember that we continued to talk until the game. I don't remember any more of the conversation. They watched the game until the end, and the Bulldogs won. Then they left. 

I never have forgotten that incident.I wonder if it has something to do with "Atlas F missiles being built in the state".

Thursday, April 3, 2014

The Gospel According to Peanuts - 3


In his final chapter of The Gospel According to Peanuts, titled "The Hound of Heaven", author Robert Short suggests that the dog Snoopy represents “a little Christ”: 
Snoopy we would hesitate to call "Christ". He comes closer, rather, to being "a little Christ" -- that is, a Christian. .... He is, in other words, a fairly drawn caricature for what is probably the typical Christian.

The dog, because of his wonderful qualities of love, loyalty, watchfulness and courage (Charlie Brown's description) often has been used as a symbol for faith in literature and art; it is even used in this way in the Bible. But the dog also is a good symbol for faith as there is a real sense in which a man must become "as a dog" before he can become a Christian. He must take on the dog's lowliness of complete obedience and humility at the feet of his master and in service to others. ....

Snoopy, as a little Christ, quite obviously takes on Christ's ambivalent work of humbling the exalted ....
 Although Short hesitated to say that Snoopy represented Jesus Christ, Short pointed out some interesting indications of that ultimate relationship.

Although Schulz initially portrayed Snoopy as an ordinary puppy, he gradually portrayed him as a supernatural dog that was superior to human beings and was above human preoccupations:


Furthermore, Snoopy loved human beings condescendingly.


Snoopy tried to communicate to the children, but was limited to projecting his thoughts to them. Snoopy could not communicate to the children in their spoken language. The reader of the comic strip was allowed to read Snoopy’s thoughts fully, but the children-characters seemed to understand Snoopy only partially, if at all.

----------

As a student of the Bible, Schulz might have noticed and pondered a couple of New Testament passages that mention dogs. It seems that Schulz referred subtly to those passages in a few Peanuts episodes that included Snoopy. .

Short points out one mention of dogs in The Gospel According to Matthew, Chapter 15. 
A Canaanite woman ... came to him, crying out, “Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is demon-possessed and suffering terribly.” 
Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, “Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.” 
He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.” 
The woman came and knelt before him. “Lord, help me!” she said. 
He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.” 
“Yes it is, Lord,” she said. “Even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.” 
Then Jesus said to her, “Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted.” And her daughter was healed at that moment.
 This Gospel story resonates with a Peanuts episode in which Snoopy enjoys eating table scraps and declares: "Anything that falls on the floor is mine." (Short quoted that cartoon on page 86 did not reproduce it.)

At that early stage of Schulz's religious-symbolic thinking, Snoopy represented the Canaanite woman's daughter -- a non-Jew hungering to be liberated from demons.

In the Bible story, Jesus seems to redefine his own mission on Earth. God the Father had sent God the Son to Earth to assume the physical form of a human being, Jesus Christ, but retaining divine sensibilities and powers. This Jesus Christ was supposed to interact with human beings and ultimately, although immortal, suffer death as a human being. In his encounter with the Canaanite woman, Jesus realized that his mission would save not only Jews, but also non-Jews.

Elaborating this concept, the Son of God descended to Earth to share the mortal sufferings of all human beings, including even the Canaanite, demon-possessed daughter. Jesus Christ now was inspired to identify himself with this daughter, who like a dog, had to resort to eating the crumbs that fall from dining table. Symbolically, Jesus Christ now was debased not merely to the Canaanite daughter herself, but further to the dog that symbolized the daughter.

Thus when Snoopy declared that "Anything that falls on the floor is mine", Snoopy began his metamorphosis into Jesus Christ in the Peanuts religious symbology.

----------

A subsequent step in this metamorphosis was an episode in which Snoopy Snoopy licked Lucy's face and then licked Linus's hand and tried to lick his face.


Short points out the resonance of this episode with the New Testament episode in which Jesus washed his disciples' feet, as reported in The Gospel According to John, Chapter 13:
Jesus knew that the Father had put all things under his power, and that He had come from God and was returning to God.

So He got up from the meal, took off his outer clothing, and wrapped a towel around his waist. After that, he poured water into a basin and began to wash his disciples' feet, drying them with the towel that was wrapped around him.

He came to Simon Peter, who said to him, "Lord, are you going to wash my feet?"

Jesus replied, "You do not realize now what I am doing, but later you will understand."

"No," said Peter, "you shall never wash my feet."

Jesus answered, "Unless I wash you, you have no part with me."

"Then, Lord," Simon Peter replied, "not just my feet but my hands and my head as well!"
 Short fails to point out the other relevant Biblical mention of dogs in The Gospel According to Luke, Chapter 16 -- the story of dogs licking the feet of Lazarus, who starved for crumbs to fall from a dinner table:
There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores and longing to eat what fell from the rich man's table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.

The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham's side. The rich man also died and was buried. In hell, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. So he called to him, 'Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.' 
But Abraham replied, 'Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. ....

The rich man answered: "Then I beg you, Father, send Lazarus to my father's house, for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment."

Abraham replied: "They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them. ... If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead."
 Schulz might have pondered these Bible stories that mentioned dogs, and then Schulz developed Snoopy's significance in Peanuts. Snoopy gradually incorporated a divine spirit that acted on God the Father's behalf to interact with, to console and encourage, and ultimately to save the comic strip's children from their anxieties.

----------

The clearest indication that Snoopy eventually represented Jesus Christ Himself occurred in one of the episodes in which Linus and Charlie Brown were sitting in a pumpkin patch. Linus was waiting for the Great Pumpkin and then suddenly saw a silhouette rising in another part of the pumpkin patch.


The expression "'used dog" -- said by Charlie Brown and by Snoopy -- might have a subtle double meaning -- that God (or Schulz) has used a dog to represent the Son of God (or the Great Pumpkin).

----------

Snoopy interacted with Linus occasionally by playfully grabbing Linus's security blanket with his teeth and trying to run away with it. Usually Linus would hold on in an epic tug of war. On a few occasions, Snoopy managed to escape with the blanket and hide it from Linus. After Linus became inconsolably distraught, however, Snoopy would retrieve the blanket mercifully to Linus.



I think these episodes have a religious meaning. Linus represents a young pastor, clinging to the doctrines he learned recently at the seminary. Snoopy, representing Jesus Christ, playfully teased Linus by yanking away his doctrinal security blanket for awhile. Snoopy was trying to wean Linus from this security blanket, encouraging Linus to mature and to think freely.

When Lucy, however, confiscated Linus's blanket and thus weakened him beyond his ability to cope 



then Snoopy returned the blanket to Linus, thus answering his prayers.




----------

Short wrote his book before Snoopy began writing a book and flying his doghouse as an airplane, but I would like to add my own speculations about the possible meanings of those developments.

Eventually, Snoopy began writing a book, which began with the words “It was a dark and stormy night”. Evidently, the book's first part would be scary and suspenseful. The book’s further text never was revealed, but we can suppose that the ending would be happy and encouraging. One remark by Charlie Brown indicated that Snoopy's book ultimately would be about theology.
Charlie Brown: I hear you're writing a book of theology. 
Snoopy: I have have the perfect title. Has It Ever Occurred to You That You Might Be Wrong? 
(I found this quote in the Michaelis biography, Schulz and Peanuts.)

Before Snoopy finished his book, however, he learned to fly his doghouse magically, like a combat airplane through the sky. High in the clouds, Snoopy fought against and shot down other airborne enemy beings – in particular the notorious Red Barron. Snoopy thus became a hero in a cosmic war that was not perceived by the children among whom Snoopy had lived on the Earth.

We can suppose that Snoopy’s book might begin on a dark and stormy night on Earth but then eventually conclude with Snoopy’s victorious cosmic war in the Heavens, lit brightly by the stars of the quiet universe. After the Red Barron and his fellow enemy pilots were shot down from the sky, then Snoopy would fly his doghouse-airplane back down and rejoin the children on Earth. There he will complete his book, for the children to read, understand and enjoy.

Monday, March 31, 2014

The Gospel According to Peanuts - 2

Charles Schulz had begun drawing his Peanuts comic strip in 1950. In 1952, a paperback book of the all that year’s episodes was published, and every year afterwards a new such book was published. Our family had many of these books, and I read them repeatedly. I was an expert about Peanuts by the time The Gospel According to Peanuts was published.


I think I began reading Peanuts every day in the newspapers in about 1959, when I was in second grade. I continued to read the strip every day through the 1960s. I eventually stopped reading it when Peppermint Patty became the main character of a mostly new cast at the beginning of the 1970s.

In the year 1963, the number-one and number-two, best-selling, non-fiction books in the USA were Schulz’s Happiness is a Warm Puppy and Security is a Thumb and a Blanket.

In the year 1965, the best-selling, non-fiction book was Robert L. Short’s The Gospel According to Peanuts, which I wrote about in my previous blog post. This book eventually sold ten million copies, one of which was purchased by my parents. I was in eighth grade, and I read the book to the best of my ability.

Recently, I bought the book at a used-book sale and read it again.

I began writing about the book, about Schulz and Peanuts in my previous post, and I will continue in this post here.

----------

In 1963, Short earned a Masters Degree in Theology and Literature from the University of Chicago. He subsequently began a doctorate program in Systematic Theology at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary at Northwest University. He developed a slide show about theology, illustrated by episodes from the Peanuts and Pogo comic strips. He turned his slide show into a book proposal. The book was an immediate success. In the following years, eight more of his books of pop-culture theology have been published (e.g. Is Kurt Vonnegut the Exorcist of Jesus Christ Superstar? and The Parables of Dr. Seuss).

Despite its popular success, The Gospel According to Peanuts is difficult to read. I am now 61 years old and have read about religion for my entire adult life, and I struggled to follow his thread of thought on many pages. Nevertheless, I found him to be quite though-provoking in several of his arguments.

After Short’s book became a best-seller, Short and Schulz met, became friends and participated together several public discussions. The two men stayed in contact for several years. Schulz said that many of Short’s interpretations mischaracterized Shulz’s intentions. Schulz was simply trying to be funny, and Short read too much into the humor.

By the second half of the 1960s, however, when Schulz was dismissing Short’s interpretations, Schulz had stopped attending church and had become publicly critical of Christianity. His thinking and attitudes had evolved far since 1950, when he drew his first Peanuts episode, which depicted four-year-old children as hateful.


Although Schulz might say many years later that he simply was trying to be funny, he evidently was dealing at least subconsciously with various beliefs and hostilities that he resolved in much later years.

In other words, Short might be insightful in some of his opinions even though Schulz dismisses them as mistaken.

----------

Short titled his book’s first chapter “The Church and The Arts”. He pointed out the limited effectiveness of direct proof in converting people to Christianity. Systematic theologians such as himself convert few people by developing detailed logical arguments.


Artists, using indirect methods, usually are more effective. People are attracted by the church’s artistry – the music, architecture, paintings, sculptures, prayers, rituals, pageants, etc.

Religious artists subvert and undermine even the most stubborn resistance of unbelievers.

On the other hand, religious artists often become troublesome for the Church. For example, they adopt many of the artistic methods and concepts of unbelievers. Gospel music becomes pop music. Church services become television shows. Theological discussions are conducted in comic strips.

Artists communicate outside the intellectual frameworks established by the theologians. Artists often confront the difficult questions in spontaneous, clever ways, not relying on the Church’s carefully developed doctrines. Successful, popular religious artists cannot be controlled easily by the Church leadership.

----------

A perennial story in the strip’s history was Linus’s participation in his church’s Christmas Eve pageant. He was supposed to memorize and recite some Bible verses. He was afraid to fail in this performance, partly because his older sister Lucy threatened to mock and beat him if he did fail.

Alongside this story about Linus would run other stories about the other children calculating their own deserving of Christmas presents from Santa Claus. The children engaged each other in philosophical conversations along the lines that Santa Claus should ignore their various faults and misbehaviors that might have been observed during the entire year and should instead reward them generously for their exceptionally good behavior during the few weeks right before Christmas. Santa Claus deserved to be deceived and exploited for the children’s benefit.


Charlie Brown was appalled by this cynicism, but he too was drawn into it despite his own better judgment. He too finds himself calculating and scheming to maximize his presents from Santa Claus.

Linus was so consumed by his efforts to memorize his Bible verses perfectly for the Christmas Eve pageant that he never involved himself in the others’ philosophical discussions about deserving presents from Santa Claus.

Eventually, however, Linus developed a unique belief in a Great Pumpkin, which would come uniquely to Linus and award him presents on Halloween. The Great Pumpkin would reward Linus not for Linus’s good behavior, but rather merely because Linus believed that the Great Pumpkin would come. Even though Linus believed fervently, however, the Great Pumpkin never came. Linus never was rewarded for his belief. Instead, Linus was puzzled, disappointed and humiliated repeatedly.


----------

In this interwoven plot, Schulz seems to be mocking several Christian phenomena – recitation of Bible verses, the calculation of good deeds or of proclaimed faith to earn divine rewards, the continual expectation of a Divine Coming, and individual delusions. In other words, Schulz is being a successful religious artist who has become troublesome for the Church.

I think (this section is my own interpretation, not Short’s) that Shulz is depicting affectionately two kinds of church members: 1) the ordinary, practical members, and 2) the fervent, intellectual members.

When Charles Schulz returned from World War Two to his home in an emotional depression, he found meaning for his life by attending his small church and engaging himself in Bible study and church activities. He was not a religious thinker, a theologian, in his church. Rather, he was an ordinary member who found practical benefits, such as relieving his personal depression. Schulz was drawn in for practical benefits – as Charlie Brown was drawn into gaming Santa Claus.

Linus represented another, more fervent, somewhat unreliable kind of church member – like a young pastor, freshly graduated from the seminary and newly assigned to lead a mostly older congregation. Linus had to recite Bible verses to the entire congregation. Linus felt compelled to develop doctrine and to lead others accordingly. This self-imposed leadership role included a risk that Linus might go widely astray.

These are realities of religious life. Church members include superficial calculators and foolish heretics and many other varieties of sinners. There is much to laugh at. However, their search, through religion, for meaning in life is a noble drama.

Although Schulz pokes fun, his portrayal is charming. His Peanuts children are discussing the meaning of their actions and lives, are memorizing Bible verses to participate in religious pageants, are declaring their beliefs, and are failing but persisting. Their lives are full of drama and meaning.


Even though we are sinners, condemned from birth, we can laugh about our dismal situation and continue to strive. 

Sunday, March 30, 2014

The Gospel According to Peanuts - 1


In 1965, the number-one best-selling non-fiction book in the USA was The Gospel According to Peanuts, written by a theology-doctoral student named Robert L. Short. Eventually more than ten million copies of the book were sold.

My parents bought a copy of the book in about 1965, when I was in about the eighth grade. I read the book to the best of my ability. The book was illustrated by many examples from the Peanuts comic strip.



The Peanuts comic strip was syndicated and began to run in 1950. During the first two years, the main characters were Charlie, Shermy, Patty, Violet, Frieda and Pig-Pen. All these characters were about four years old.

In 1952, the latter four characters began to disappear and were replaced by Lucy, Linus and Schroeder. In 1959, Sally appeared as the fourth major character.

On several occasions, Charlie Brown specified his own age as follows:

* November 3, 1950 – "only four years old".  

* November 17, 1957 – "six years old

* July 11, 1979– "eight-and-a-half years old"

Therefore in 1964, when Short wrote The Gospel According to Peanuts, Charlie was in about third grade. The five major characters were arrayed in age approximately thus:

** Charlie Brown – third grade

** Sally Brown (Charlie’s sister) – pre-school

** Lucy van Pelt – second grade

** Linus van Pelt (Lucy’s brother) – kindergarten

** Schroeder – third grade

Although many readers probably think that Charlie and Lucy were about the same age, she was obviously younger than him when she appeared in 1952.

At one point, Lucy advised Linus about beginning kindergarten:

Lucy: You have to know a lot of things before you can go to kindergarten, Linus. You have to be able to use a handkerchief, get a drink of water alone, put on your own coat, and cut with a scissors. 
Linus: Wow! I never realized the requirements were so rigid.
Here is another conversation where Lucy is preparing Linus for kindergarten:
Lucy: Some stars are big, and some stars are little. 
Linus: You sure know a lot about stars, Lucy. 
Lucy: I've done quite a bit of studying. One of my best subjects in school was agriculture.
We know Charlie and Schroeder were the same age, because they played on the same baseball team, as pitcher and catcher.

The sixth main character was the dog Snoopy. He began as a puppy in 1950s but gradually evolved into an adult, super-natural dog. Snoopy began to walk on two legs in 1955 and began to sleep on his doghouse’s roof in 1960. (Short’s book was published before Snoopy began to write a book and to fly his doghouse as an airplane in 1965.)

----------

I have belabored the children’s young ages because The Gospel According to Peanuts argues that Peanuts justifies the Christian doctrine of Original Sin. All human beings are born sinful and therefore deserve God’s condemnation even while they are still children. This is a doctrine that strikes many people, including many Christians, as unjust. After all, young children are quite dependent, ignorant and harmless and therefore should be excused.



Peanuts depicts a society where the oldest members were (in the mid 1960s) in the third grade. No adults are seen or heard. The children are mean, rude, snobbish, greedy, demand­ing, conceited. They recognize these vices in themselves and others; they recognize the vices’ consequences for themselves and others; they cannot correct the vices and avoid the consequences. They suffer from chronic anxiety, neurosis, frustration and unhappiness. Their conversation is peppered with references to philosophical and religious concepts, indicating intelligent intro­spection and awareness.



In sum, the Peanuts children were growing up with the consequences of Original Sin.

----------

Charles (“Sparky”) Schulz was born in 1922 and grew up as the only child of a barber and housewife in St Paul, Minnesota. Both parents dropped out of school after their third grades and were barely literate. The father was elected to serve as the recording secretary of the local barbers’ association. He brought home minimal notes, and Sparky wrote the meeting minutes. There was practically no intellectual conversation in the family.

The father and mother were the children of German and Norwegian immigrants, and so the family was nominally Lutheran. They rarely attended church, however, because the father preferred to fish on Sunday mornings.

Sparky did well in elementary school and was allowed to skip fourth grade. From then on, however, he was the youngest student in his class and felt inferior. In high school he had little interest in studying, preferring to draw. In about his freshman year, he flunked four courses. He soon decided to try to become a cartoonist as his career. He coasted through the rest of high school and did not consider continuing into college.

In his last two high-school years his mother became increasingly sick from cancer. The family moved from their house into an apartment above a pharmacy, so that the pharmacist could conveniently come upstairs twice a day to inject medicines into the mother.

In his mother’s last, dying days, he was drafted into the Army. A few days later, at his first assignment, he was given a weekend leave to visit home. His mother died on that weekend. The Lutheran pastor failed to show up as promised, so the father asked another pastor, one of his barbershop customers, to perform the funeral at his small Church of God church. The father and Sparky appreciated the pastor’s favor and the church’s simplicity and decided to attend that church in the future.

In the Army, Schulz was assigned to a machine-gun squad and was deployed to Europe. His squad moved all the way across France and Germany, but he participated in practically no combat. He drew pictures of Army life for his buddies’ letters home.

Released from the Army, Schulz returned home in November 1945 and settled back with his father in the apartment above the pharmacy. In February 1946, a fire in the apartment’s basement destroyed Schulz’s entire collection of art materials.

Depressed and lonely, Sparky began attending the Church of God church regularly, services on Wednesday evenings and Sunday mornings and evenings. The congregation comprised about 65 members, several of whom were military veterans his age. These veterans were especially thankful to God that they had survived the war. Sparky wanted to marry another church member but never met a suitable young woman in the small congregation.

Sparky was baptized by immersion at a church retreat in August 1948. On a couple occasions, he preached on street corners and in refuges for vagrants. Out of his meager earnings, he purchased a half-page advertisement in a St Paul newspaper, summarizing the Church of God’s doctrine.

His church pastor suggested to the Church headquarters in Anderson, Indiana, that Schulz be hired to work as a cartoonist and illustrator. Schulz traveled to Anderson and was interviewed by the Church’s president, who decided not to hire him.

----------

In August 1946, he was hired into the staff of an art-studies correspondence school, Art Instruction, in Minneapolis. He evaluated the lessons that the students mailed in.

In the Army and in the following years, Sparky began to read a lot. He subscribed to Book of the Month. He also read a lot of religious books. For many years he led Bible-study groups at his churches and thus read carefully through the entire Bible four times.

In his free time, he drew and submitted cartoons to various periodicals. During 1948-1950, he sold 15 cartoons to The Saturday Evening Post. He also sold a series of cartoons to the St. Paul newspaper.

In the March 1950, Sparky began dating a young woman who worked in Art Instruction’s accounting department. In June he signed a contract with United Features Syndicate to arrange publication of his proposed comic strip, which was named Peanuts. He hoped this initial professional success would convince the woman to marry him, but she soon dumped him – partly because her own family wanted her to marry a Lutheran. She soon married another man, a Lutheran, at about the same time that newspapers began to publish Peanuts, at the beginning of October 1950.

----------

Schulz had developed his idea for a comic strip about children in 1949, when he sold some cartoons to the St Paul newspaper. The publisher usually placed the cartoons on the wedding page, simply because that page often needed some filler. Since most of that page’s readers were women, Schulz tried to draw cartoons that featured small children, especially girls outsmarting boys. Schulz reasoned that a cartoon strip along those lines might attract a large readership, since the birth rate was rising greatly.

When publication of Peanuts began in October 1950, Schulz was 27 years old and single, still living with his father. He had grown up as an only child and had no children of his own. In April 1951, Sparky married a woman, Joyce, who had been married to another man very briefly and already had a one-year-old daughter, Meredith.

In 1952, the Peanuts cast changed significantly. Most of the original characters began to disappear and were replaced gradually by Lucy, Linus and Schroeder. The addition of Lucy and Linus was prompted by the birth of the Schulz’s son Monte in that year. The family two children Meredith and Monte became the model for Lucy and Linus – a bossy older sister and a compliant younger brother.

----------

Sparky’s wife Joyce also was a model for Lucy. Essentially, Joyce treated Sparky as Lucy treated Charlie. The Schulz marriage always was contentious and eventually ended in a bitter divorce in 1972.

One important issue in their marriage was Joyce’s lack of participation in Sparky’s church activities. She rarely attended church with him, even though he had become the assistant pastor of the St Paul church by 1958. Since he always tithed to the church and was steadily becoming extremely wealthy, she resented his increasingly large contributions. To break his ties to the St Paul church and weaken his ties to the Church of God, she insisted that the family move to California in 1958.

In California, he joined a Methodist church, where he continued his leadership of Bible-study groups that read carefully all the way through the Bible. Joyce never attended church with him there. Following her example and because Sparky did not insist, none of their five children ever attended church in California either.

Eventually Sparky himself drifted away from church attendance and participation and became increasingly critical about Christianity.

When the Schulz marriage broke up at the end of the 1960s and beginning of the 1970s, Lucy was essentially replaced by Peppermint Patty and Marcie, who led a third cast of characters.

----------

From 1956 to 1965 Schulz drew also a comic strip titled Young Pillars for a religious periodical titled Youth, published by the Church of God. Schulz’s decision to stop drawing that religious strip perhaps marked his personal break from Christianity.



Ironically, however, the year 1965 was the year of his biggest cultural contribution to Christianity – the television special A Charlie Brown Christmas, which was broadcast during that year’s Christmas season. Schulz insisted that the story end with a long reading from The Gospel According to Luke¸ telling about an angel telling shepherds about Jesus’ birth.



----------

My information about Schulz's life came from two biographies:

* Good Grief: The Story of Charles M. Schulz, by Rheta Grimsley Johnson, published in 1989

* Schulz and Peanuts: A Biography, by David Michaelis, published in 2001